Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marginmike who wrote (123691)	9/19/2001 11:41:34 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

So much for the Saudi Arabia to assist the US in those dire time after saving their ass in 1991.......... Keep oil prices high as if the economy is expanding ........... and Prince Whaled (spl?) just stated on Monday on CNBC that they will lower oil prices to the $20 to $25 range. quote.bloomberg.com ............ come at your own conclusion about public statements of certain leaders who stated that they are supporting the US and the Western Countries. ............

To: marginmike who wrote (123691)	9/19/2001 11:44:53 AM
From: patron_anejo_por_favor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<Its not the insurence co's fault that the FAA has its head up its ass>> While it's not their "fault", they are in the business of assessing risk, no? The buildings were a target of previous attacks and ongoing threats. Therefore the premiums they charged should have reflected it, as should their reserves. Also, they'll benefit going forward from higher premiums charged to everyone else. They do not need, and should not get a DIME of taxpayers money. And while its not the insurers fault, sadly the same can not be said for the airlines, who put pressure constantly on the FAA to reduce security measures. They get NO sympathy from me at all in this.