SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldworldnet who wrote (183757)9/19/2001 11:45:03 AM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
REP. BARBARA LEE’S (D-CA) VOTES ON LEGISLATION REGARDING THE TERRORIST
ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001

September 17, 2001

On Wednesday, September 12, the day after the attacks, I voted in favor of H. J. Res. 61, which condemns the terrorist attacks, extends our deepest condolences to the victims and their families, commends the heroic efforts of the rescue workers, supports the President in punishing the perpetrators of the attacks, and states that September 12 will be a national day of unity and mourning.

On Thursday, September 13, I voted in favor of H. Con. Res. 225, which expresses the sense of Congress that Americans should fly the American flag; in favor of H.R. 2882, which will expedite payments of benefits to families of public safety officers killed or injured in the attacks; and in favor of H.R. 2884, which provides tax relief to the victims of the attacks.

On Friday, September 14, I voted in favor of H.R. 2888, which provides $40 billion in emergency funding for increased public safety, anti-terrorism activities, disaster recovery efforts, and assistance for the victims of this tragedy.

On Friday, September 14, I voted against H. J. Res. 64, which ceded Congress’s future authority to the President regarding the use of military force in response to the terrorist attacks. Our Constitution provides for checks and balances between our branches of government. This resolution does not obligate the President to report back to Congress after 60 days, as was required by Congress during the Gulf War, about the actions our military will take. Additionally, this resolution authorizes an open-ended action and significantly reduces Congress’s authority in this matter. We must bring the perpetrators of this horrific action to justice. But during this period of grief, mourning, and anger, the U.S. Congress has a responsibility to urge the use of restraint so that the violence does not spiral out of control and to consider all of the implications of our actions.

Attached is a copy of my floor statement from September 14 on H. J. Res. 64, the resolution authorizing the use of force.

BILLS REP. LEE HAS COSPONSORED:

1) A resolution condemning bigotry, racism and violence against Arab Americans, American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia following the terrorist attacks. Soon to be introduced by Rep. Bonior (D-MI).

2) The Spirit of America Commemorative Coin Act, which commemorates the victims of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Soon to be introduced by Reps. Engel (D-NY) and Watts (R-OK).

house.gov

* * *



To: goldworldnet who wrote (183757)9/19/2001 12:13:25 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
America's war song

Robert W. Tracinski

jewishworldreview.com -- IT was September 14. Washington, D.C., had been attacked, and one of its most prominent monuments had been burned by the enemy. A Washington lawyer sat in the early morning gloom and fretted over the fate of his country.

The year was 1814, the burned monument was the White House, the man was Francis Scott Key, and his worry was centered on Fort McHenry, off in the distance, where he looked for any sign that his nation's flag still flew after a fierce night-long bombardment. He expressed his patriotism in a poem, "The Star-Spangled Banner." We all know the first stanza of this poem because it is our national anthem. But Key wrote four stanzas, three of which the average American has never heard. Today, as we face a crisis similar to the one Key observed, it is important to hear and understand the spirit expressed in those unremembered verses.

The first stanza is, of course, known by heart:

Oh, say can you see, by the dawn's early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight,
O'er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.
O say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

Key had watched throughout the night, hoping that Fort McHenry would hold out. As dawn broke, the fort's commander had its rain-soaked flag taken down, and he sent up an enormous 30- by 42-foot flag, which had been specially made as a symbol of defiance against the fort's attackers.

When Key spotted it, he would later write, "in that hour of deliverance, my heart spoke. Does not such a country, and such defenders of their country, deserve a song?" He began writing "The Star-Spangled Banner." The first stanza expressed Key's anxious concern for his country. The second expressed his elation as he saw the banner rise:

On the shore, dimly seen through the mists of the deep,
Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes,
What is that which the breeze, o'er the towering steep,
As it fitfully blows, now conceals, now discloses?
Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beam,
In full glory reflected now shines on the stream:
'Tis the star-spangled banner! O long may it wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

In his pride in his nation and his contempt for its foe, Key did not, as we do today, fret over enemy losses or "collateral damage." He saw the death of the enemy as proof of justice. Thus, his third stanza:

And where is that band who so vauntingly swore
That the havoc of war and the battle's confusion
A home and a country should leave us no more?
Their blood has wiped out their foul footstep's pollution.
No refuge could save the hireling and slave
From the terror of flight, or the gloom of the grave:
And the star-spangled banner in triumph doth wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Today, this attitude would be denounced, by those who pretend to be "idealistic," as jingoistic and intolerant. But Key did not apologize for his love of his country and his liberty. His confidence was grounded in a religious perspective that I do not share -- but I do share and admire the pride with which he upheld the value of his country, a pride expressed in the fourth stanza:

Oh! thus be it ever, when freemen shall stand
Between their loved homes and the war's desolation!
Blest with victory and peace, may the heaven-rescued land
Praise the Power that hath made and preserved us a nation.
Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just,
And this be our motto: "In G-d is our trust."
And the star-spangled banner forever shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

Among today's intellectuals, it is fashionable to be indiscriminately "anti-war" -- that is, to oppose any war, just or unjust. But the meaning and events behind "The Star-Spangled Banner" are a reminder that the existence of our nation, and the preservation of our liberties, had to be obtained by war -- and that they must, from time to time, be maintained by war.

jewishworldreview.com