Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PROLIFE who wrote (183810)	9/19/2001 3:06:25 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Okay! Pro, I will answer your question. NO she doesn't take any pornography to school and that includes the book that you get your information from. So I've answered your question so will you now answer mine?But I'm amused with your..."funny you ranters always have a parable you "want" answered"...But Pro, that is the way your head honcho did it...Matthew 13:10-14 Are you disagreeing with his method of communication. You devil!

To: PROLIFE who wrote (183810)	9/19/2001 4:35:56 PM
From: Arthur Radley	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Pro, You are truly an amazing individual. You continously post your homophobic diatribes and your unrelenting..."I'm right and your are wrong"...mantra here on SI. Even when the issue of veracity, as it relates to Dr. Dobson's organization, you were going to the source and get the truth. But juxtapose the same issue as it relates to you,and you duck, dodge, and ignore the subject. For a man that is always RIGHT, why isn't it easy for you to answer? My nephew, who happens to be one of those individuals that "chose" his lifestyle that you are so abhorrent to, wants to know why you can't prove me wrong...again, since you are always right. Isn't it part of your belief that the truth shall set you free. But we know the answer, as to why you avoid a simple yes or no! Pro, I'm truly sorry that you have backed yourself into this corner of dilemma. It is hard, when pressed with a simple yes or no answer! It just doesn't leave you any wiggle room, does it? And what is so ironic, is that the question that I pose to you is so simple in it's ramifications to your adamancy of being right all the time. It makes the answer reveal so simply, if one has to so answer with either the truth or if one has to lie with his answer. If you lie in your answer, then why will you bother to contact Dobson's organization to seek such information. Wouldn't a mirror get to the issue more quickly than a phone call or letter? But if you answer truthfully, then your whole "I'm right and you are wrong" is debunked. Don't worry! I will not ask you to apologize to my nephew here on SI, when you answer with the truthfull answer. Now isn't that nice of me? And just for clarification Pro, I was disgusted with the man and women that recently saw no problem with their "get-to-gather" in full public view in the Skydome in Toronto. I would be just as equally disgusted with my nephew if he did the same with his partner in the Skydome. Public vs Private...big difference, my friend! Now maybe you will understand better that I'm not the person that is so much against human decency and civil manners. But enough of my character...let's get back to the truth or a lie answer that deals with your character. Okay!