SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JayPC who wrote (2956)9/20/2001 11:27:20 AM
From: ahhahaRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
Why don't they do what I suggest?



To: JayPC who wrote (2956)9/20/2001 1:59:55 PM
From: frankw1900Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24758
 
Minister reserved about airline bailout

Collenette is not the sharpest knife in the cabinet and I'm surprised he's taking this tack. But good for him. So far.
There is equivocation but not abasement. It helps that Air Canada is extremely unpopular.

Thursday, September 20, 2001 – Page B1

OTTAWA, TORONTO AND OTTAWA
-- Federal Transport Minister David Collenette was
non-committal yesterday on Air Canada's request for up to
$4-billion in federal aid to cope with fallout from Sept. 11
terrorist attacks -- a bailout plea that was met with
skepticism across the country yesterday.

He told reporters that Canada doesn't necessarily think
Ottawa has to bail out domestic carriers in the same manner
that Washington is considering helping U.S. airlines.

"Just because the U.S. Congress does something, just
because the U.S. administration does something, doesn't
mean to say that we follow suit," Mr. Collenette told
reporters yesterday.

Talk in Ottawa is instead turning to the possibility that Air
Canada, which has been losing money consistently since
taking over Canadian Airlines, is headed for another
restructuring of some kind.

"We have to have a major rethink of the whole industry in
Canada," a Liberal insider said. "Air Canada may have to be
restructured and downsized."

The insider said the Liberal caucus is skeptical about the
carrier's plea for money and is "quite hostile about being put
in this position again."

Mr. Collenette told reporters that it has been "quite apparent
for some time that Air Canada has some challenges," and
said Ottawa and the carrier have been discussing these "on
and off."

Air Canada's request for help comes on the heels of a similar
plea for aid from U.S. carriers hard-hit by last week's
terrorist attacks.

U.S. carriers originally asked Congress for $24-billion (U.S.),
but yesterday cut their bailout wish-list by about 30 per cent
to $17.5-billion.

Mr. Collenette was careful not to rule out assistance for Air
Canada or other Canadian carriers that face a slumping
travel industry in the wake of last week's terrorist attacks on
the United States.

But he said Ottawa is trying to determine what assistance
carriers need -- and exactly how to dispense it fairly, "not
just to the airline industry but to all those other industries
that have been affected."

He also said any solution must address the "continued
financial viability of the airline industry and, in particular,
Air Canada."

Air industry executives are meeting with Mr. Collenette late
this afternoon to discuss the financial pressures facing the
sector. Critics of Air Canada were roundly skeptical, and
even angry, at the carrier's contention that it needs between
$3-billion (Canadian) to $4-billion to cope with fallout from
last week's terrorist strikes.

Liberal Senator Michael Kirby, who chaired a Senate
committee on the airline industry two years ago, said he
doesn't buy the Montreal-based carrier's argument that it
needs help solely because of the attacks. "I am more than
skeptical. It can't possibly be true."

Mr. Kirby said Canada should insist on several conditions
before agreeing to indemnify the airline, including the
removal of the 15-per-cent ceiling on individual share
ownership and the withdrawal of Air Canada's anti-takeover
poison pill. He said these merely serve to entrench the
company's management and board of directors, who were
running the airline at a loss despite having a virtual
monopoly in the country.

The head of rival carrier WestJet Airlines Ltd. called the
multibillion-dollar request "lunacy," and said Canadian
carriers only require compensation from Ottawa for the
several days that national airspace was shut down last week.

Clive Beddoe, chairman and chief executive officer of
WestJet, said Air Canada was headed for financial trouble
"long before this tragic crisis occurred."

Air Canada spokeswoman Laura Cooke said its request is not
just for cash but also loan guarantees, tax deferrals and the
assumption by Ottawa of preflight security costs that airlines
currently bear.

Air Canada president and CEO Robert Milton has said that
bookings have been "extremely soft" since the attacks, and
warned that without government aid, Air Canada could run
out of cash. The problem is exacerbated by the fact that the
airline is going into the slow fall season, when costs exceed
revenue even in good years.

As of June 30, Air Canada had about $1.25-billion in cash
and credit available. With strong performances in July and
August, that figure may have been even higher before last
week's attacks. Mr. Milton said last week's three-day service
disruption cost about $100-million. The airline won't say how
quickly it could run out of cash.

Analysts said the key question is just how much air travel
dries up as a result of last week's attacks. Air Canada won't
quantify the drop in bookings.


globeandmail.com