SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Pitera who wrote (4635)9/20/2001 1:10:42 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 33421
 
>>Historically you tend to see a big player go "belly up" before one of these bear markets are over. Often it's
a Bank, Brokerage house, or large Hedge Fund. It looks like we'll see more of this with the airlines and that's
assisting the process.
<<

If this keeps up, "one" big player might just be optimistic.

I believe the "shake out" we are witnessing will be on a most fundamental level.

Consolidations, business closures, continued earnings "contraction".

We've discussed the "demand" side of the economic equation here for months, not knowing of course, we would see a cataclysmic event that would become the final coup de gras .(which I believe we are seeing)

In spite of Greenspan's "caution" to not act precipitously, I believe the market is saying "whatever" stimulus package comes, it will be too little, too late.



To: John Pitera who wrote (4635)9/20/2001 3:16:29 PM
From: Yorikke  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 33421
 
John,

I believe one of the major 'weaknesses' in the market has been that we DID see a major hedge fund go belly up a couple of years back and the fed moved to lessen the impact of that failure. All the big players got off lightly and the attitudes did not change. What would have been a major shock to the economy was not avoided but simply delayed. There have been a string of actions by the FED that will be labeled as overreaction when history is written.

The fed can not avoid the reality of poor investment decisions by pumping money into the economy and dropping the interest rates again and again. All it can do is delay the acceptance by the markets that there are many shell businesses still out there eating money with no prospect of turning around their businesses. Bad business concepts can only be disguised for a limited time. The extent of that 'limit' can be as long as the Japanese have managed to hide theirs; running into a decade of denial, or it can be a matter of a few years as we seem to be seeing in the US economy.

The 'feel good' era is over. Our need to face the harsh realities of the world is going to be far reaching. The Feds current response may be the right one, but it comes after a very long period of using the same remedy for much less serious problems. Is it not that lowered interest rates and increased liquidity are the wrong decision at the moment, it is that these remedies have been used to keep the economy in 'feel good' mode for too long, and now that they are really needed the addiction nullifies the remedy.



To: John Pitera who wrote (4635)9/20/2001 3:59:03 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 33421
 
Some guy named Bass got a $2B margin call and sold a pot of DIS to cover.

EDIT: I see you reference it

I am waiting for tickq of -1800 to -2000

VIX of at least 55

though I am trading QQQs long into expiration.