Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PJ Strifas who wrote (4514)	9/20/2001 10:40:23 PM
From: faqsnlojiks	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27666

...I also believe that Iraq would just love to get a lick in too... I really don't think Iraq wants anything to do with this, the Taliban, or Bin Laden. I think that Iraq knows that if is determined that they are involved (now, or in the future), that would mark the end of one Saddam Hussein. As far as the point made that this is going to be a much more difficult war than any America has ever seen, I think we need to keep in mind one point... ...we are not going in to occupy land...we have no real need to hold acreage...all we need to do is to track the terrorist down and bring them to justice. What goes on behind us (as long as it isn't aggression) is of no consequence. In my mind, this takes a huge burden off of the military. Regards, -Joe