SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Arthur Radley who wrote (184785)9/21/2001 12:42:27 PM
From: goldworldnet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The King James version is one of the oldest English translations of the Bible and I believe the most reliable of them.

A lot of people do not like the NIV partly because a lesbian took part in that translation.

I do not read Greek, Hebrew, or Latin.

I wish I could.

* * *



To: Arthur Radley who wrote (184785)9/21/2001 2:13:21 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 769670
 
you say Now you want to prefer one version over another version. If his original message was infallible...why change it. Wasn't the first version right?

That reveals to me a very stupid and simplistic way of thinking. Stupid mean clueless. Many of the original words were written long ago. Today most words have subtle differences of meaning. In Hebrew there are 7 words that express love. I believe that men made an honest effort long ago to translate words as they believed them to be.

But you get yourself bogged down in some legalese of some infallible original message. You strain at minor details so you can find reasons to not believe and ignore the central message of Christ's teachings.

What a maroon you are.

tom watson tosiwmee