SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Buckley who wrote (47025)9/23/2001 1:37:23 PM
From: Bruce Brown  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
It was a nice show - especially during a week where the market experienced the second largest one week decline in the history of the stock market. It even topped the week in October of 1997 where a valuation crash took place. No need to mention the past 12 days have been rather historical on all fronts.

BB



To: Mike Buckley who wrote (47025)9/25/2001 12:00:52 AM
From: techreports  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
It was refreshing to watch Peter Lynch on television today. He was fielding questions from the audience, e-mails, and people on the street who were talking to roving reporters. The refreshing aspect was Lynch's recommendation that everyone think in terms of 10, 20 and 20 years for their investments, that they look closely at the balance sheets of the companies they invest in, and that they thoroughly understand the company's business before investing.

I have no problem thinking 5, 10, or 15 years. The difficult part for me is to figure out which stocks I need to own for the next 5, 10, or 15 years.

He advised everyone to write on a piece of paper three specific reasons for buying a stock and that the expectation that the stock would go up is not an allowable reason. He said that the best reason to sell a stock is because at least one of the three original reasons to own it no longer exists.

Ok, i'll give it a shot.

Gemstar: 1) according to the management & articles i've read, they hold many important patents on the IPG (a number that is growing) I'm assuming that no one can get around GMST's patents 2) Eventually (2005/06) a majority of households (in the U.S. but more importantly world-wide) will use the IPG to channel surf 3) Gemstar will generate millions from commerce, advertising, and licensing fees

Qualcomm: 1) Holds many CDMA patents (has over 630 issued and 1,164 pending) 2) As the wireless world moves to 3G, Qualcomm's technology and patents will be used by most of the wireless world. 3) Can't really think of a third one, but another important issue is whether CDMA2000 or WCDMA is more popular 5 years from now. This could effect how much market share their ASIC business has. Also cell phone sales growth is important as well.

Siebel: 1) CRM offers companies the ability to decrease costs related to acquiring new customers. Companies use CRM to get a step ahead of the competition 2) Siebel is the leader in CRM & has the barriers to keep it that away 3) CRM is a relatively young market with lots of growth left..

some other companies..brcd, emc, ntap, brcm, jdsu, beas, jnpr, ebay, cree, vrts, elon, rmbs, sbux, cost, armhy, hgsi,