SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BigMoney who wrote (81949)9/23/2001 10:14:36 PM
From: Ibexx  Respond to of 99985
 
BM,

It would be great if you could address your comments to Barron's.

barrons.com

Let us know how they reply.

Regards,
Ibexx



To: BigMoney who wrote (81949)9/23/2001 11:51:56 PM
From: XBrit  Respond to of 99985
 
<<did barrons include any opposing articles in that issue?>>

Nope. It would have been great if they could have got that English guy, Andrew Smithers, to write a dissenting view. In his book "Valuing Wall Street" (Andrew Smithers and Stephen Wright, McGraw-Hill, 2000), he addresses the "Fed Model" in Chapter 24. His Fig. 24.2 on p. 246 clearly shows that this model was a total and utter failure in the 1950-1968 period. As you pointed out, changes in the equity risk premium over time have in many past time periods been far more important than bond-yield-envy.

Two quotes from Smithers' book follow. Remember that the current low bond yields directly reflect low inflation.

"While the stock market, interest rates and inflation were all rising together in the 1950s and 1960s, it was then believed that inflation was good for shares. The theory used to support that argument was that inflation would boost future earnings and that shares were worth more today because earnings in the future would be higher."

"Yield ratios [as a guide to stock market value] have no economic basis. This is because shares represent the ownership of real assets, while bonds provide an income that is fixed in nominal terms. Shares should therefore provide a protection against inflation, at least in the longer term, that bonds don't provide. Changes in inflation thus cause [bond] interest rates to rise and fall, but there is no reason to expect such fluctuations to affect ... [stock] earnings yields. The ratio of bond yields to [stock] earnings ... should therefore vary with inflation, being high when inflation is high and vice versa."



To: BigMoney who wrote (81949)9/24/2001 12:49:01 PM
From: Psycho-Social  Respond to of 99985
 
Barron's Optimism:
Let's not criticize Barron's for unbrideled optimism. They (Alan Abelson especially) have slanted toward pessimism for a decade or more! It'll be interesting to see if their "Bull on Cover" is prescient this time, in contrast to the usual contrarian implications of Bull and Bear covers on magazines and news weeklies.