SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (186003)9/24/2001 11:33:57 AM
From: Ga Bard  Respond to of 769670
 
Oh yes you are you want to steal a right a woman has over her personal life and her body.

SO why not store all the sperm a man may need in his life time and then when he and a woman AGREE and CHOSE to have a child the sperm is used?

That way A woman does not have to lose her right to her personal life because she made the decision to get pregnant.

Simple really.

P2bAAAT



To: DMaA who wrote (186003)9/24/2001 11:36:09 AM
From: E. T.  Respond to of 769670
 
>>If nature is allowed to complete its course, the man involved in the equasion should accept the consequence of his choice and live up to his responsibility to support the family.>> Lot's of talk, but hardly any action, and usually only when a court enforces one. The reality is men don't carry their weight when it comes to rearing their kids. "F*ck em and forget em," is the clarion call of many men.



To: DMaA who wrote (186003)9/24/2001 11:49:24 AM
From: goldworldnet  Respond to of 769670
 
Great points DMA...

Personal responsibility has never been popular and personal convenience always has.

I recall reading a chilling essay drawing parallels between slavery and abortion.

* * *