Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (186077)	9/24/2001 2:07:45 PM
From: rich4eagle	Respond to of 769670

Ann, I like your thinking, but you must remember that you are mostly dealing with a bunch of ornery good ol boys here who want to take things back fifty years or so when things were just like they like em. Joe is one of the few open minded folks here.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (186077)	9/24/2001 2:14:21 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 769670

Yes indeed Annie yet another post of yours demonstrating the arrogance of the truly bigoted...

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (186077)	9/24/2001 2:29:25 PM
From: rich4eagle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Annie, you must remember that JLA is the most bigoted one sided, close minded, air bag here, who has never ever put up a single post of substance, rather just attacks through name calling of anyone who posts anything different than unltra right wing gibberish

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (186077)	9/24/2001 4:44:05 PM
From: Little Joe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

“Men are not required to be in combat in this country any longer either.” That may be true at this moment in time but men are still subject to the draft and can be required to face combat, which women have never had to do. “The point about abortion is that men could be using their time more wisely than protesting the personal domain rights of another human being. “ If a man truly believes that abortion is the taking of human life, I cannot think of anything more worth protesting. This is the dilemma both sides face. Pro Choice says abortion is not the taking of human life. Pro-Lifers believe otherwise. Ask yourself what kind of a person, believing that millions of innocent lives were being destroyed would sit by and not protest. I don’t see how a person’s beliefs in this regard have anything to do with the ability to get pregnant. “You can discuss your opinion with your significant other BUT you are not qualified to vote whether abortion should be legal or illegal.” O.K. somehow you apparently believe that it is perfectly o.k. to disenfranchise men when it comes to abortion. Where do you find this in the constitution or the Spirit of America? Little joe