Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mu Gamma Lambda -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (7912)	9/24/2001 2:21:43 PM
From: Augustus Gloop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10077

Ashcroft on MSNBC talking about crop dusters with bio weapons. All dusters have been grounded. This could be serious sh!t. I think its time to start the military action and TURBANATE THESE BASTAGES

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (7912)	9/24/2001 2:23:14 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 10077

with 6% unemployment, that would indicate that wage prices may come down a bit. If I remember correctly, this is one of the things that you were looking at on the other side. That is, unemployment was so low that wages were getting pumped up unreasonably and adding excessive costs to businesses. Bush is only 9 months into his term, unemployment may be high now, but what will count for him in the next election is what happens in the last year of his term.

To: MulhollandDrive who wrote (7912)	9/24/2001 4:07:22 PM
From: SmoothSail	Read Replies (6) \| Respond to of 10077

Is anyone else out there questioning the wisdom of pumping 15 billion into the airlines? The CEO of Continental pulls down $12 million a year and the others are in the same league. The airlines were in trouble before this attack. Why not let them go through bankruptcy like everyone else? Let the bankruptcy judge decide how the money is to be spent. Maybe he would start with these ridiculous salaries the CEOs are making. Why should we, the taxpayers, have to pay for those excesses? Why don't they contribute a little of their salary to keep more of their people on board instead of laying them off and making us pay for it?