SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GVTucker who wrote (144020)9/24/2001 2:41:40 PM
From: The Duke of URLĀ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
The Costitution Amendment II says, ...the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Especially in light of the fact that the Amendments to the Constitution were added because of a fear of governmental power...

I can see how you or anyone could easily misinterpret this sentence.

"The Second Amendment is the most unclear and vague sentence in the entire US Constitution and can be used by both sides to support just about any law or lack thereof.
"



To: GVTucker who wrote (144020)9/24/2001 2:56:11 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Boy did I open a can of worms here, even when I explicitly said I didn't want to.

Everyone, I'd feel a lot better if we dropped this debate right now.

GV, as usual you are right, especially about the 2nd Amendment being open to interpretation. In fact, I'll bet the Founding Fathers really meant to say "bare arms," as in wearing tank-tops and short-sleeve T-shirts!!! (No rotten tomatoes please ...)

Tenchusatsu (wishing right now he had a nuclear-powered handgun)