Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: carranza2 who wrote (15268)	9/24/2001 7:47:05 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander	Respond to of 34857

Few academics in election systems get really exstatic on voting, especially not according to simple 50% majority rules (one definition, adversarial 2-party systems) Some have talked about consensus rules for much more than a century, just like the neanderthals thousands of years earlier. But I hope you have noticed how I have blessed the checks and balance system of US, although it includes simple majority rule at all balanced three levels, keeping checks on each others. In my experience, something it takes both A,B,C and D to understand, not just one or two of them. Ilmarinen P.S. have no time to waste to keep up with the Free Board. (another aspect of consensus systems, wheen out the BS) That is, voting habits in 3GPP are interesting, as is harmonizing common sense with a 2/3 or more majority or consensus. (note US senate similar threshold)