SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ratan lal who wrote (1301)9/24/2001 11:01:38 PM
From: SirRealist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Powell indicated a white paper with details of evidence would be forthcoming soon. eom



To: ratan lal who wrote (1301)9/25/2001 12:23:22 AM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I suggest u are trying to expect that the fair play assured by our judicial system, is also applicable in a state of war, to people we are having a war with (in this case a broad group labeled as "terrorists and those who harbor them").

I am not sure such an expectation is realistic.

Make no mistake : the administration with the support of Congress, has voted that the US is in a state of war. there are wide ranging implications of this vote.

cheers, kumar



To: ratan lal who wrote (1301)9/25/2001 8:06:15 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 281500
 
Why are they afraid to disclose the info. Perhaps it wont stand up to scrutiny? perhaps the president needed a name and a face to focus the nations attention? It would be quite embarrasing if the president came out and said 'sorry america, we dont know who did it' so you cant vent your anger till we find the culprits.

Or perhaps to disclose it would compromise the source of the information...???

JLA


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News