SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BGR who wrote (125339)9/24/2001 10:49:05 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
You confuse effect and cause. You will never understand that the latter part of the 90's was an era which allowed for the building of gross imbalances.

While your stocks were rising at 20% a year, did you really believe that the country was really getting richer in real economic terms or did you even care whether it had any basis in reality? If you are like most Americans you didn't really care, because you felt richer. It certainly looked like in the future you wold be able to acquire more, live a more carefree life -- it's a good thing that you could enjoy the dream -- because that's all it was for most. It simply wasn't possible for the mass of folks to monetize those dreams -- had they been able to do so -- prices of real goods would certainly have to have risen dramatically, since a good part of the rise in stock prices was simply an expansion of the money supply. Value added was very small compared to the rise in asset prices -- hard for most to comprehend, I know. especially when many new corporations were started up and had fantastic sales growth year over year.



To: BGR who wrote (125339)9/24/2001 10:49:41 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
LOL, no, there really was a 'bubble', virtually everyone agrees now... course many here knew it at the time.

dAK