SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: reynoso who wrote (144096)9/25/2001 1:11:43 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
reynoso,

re: This sounds like more Intel chicanery - AMD is the low cost supplier - so why wouldn't Gateway go to AMD exclusively?

First, AMD may be the low price supplier, but maybe not the low cost supplier. Lots of things go into cost, logistics, marketing funds, inventory turns, defectives and returns, the need to stock additional supporting parts...

But if you look at the way that AMD slowly lost the business, part by part over time, it looks like consumers preferred the Intel based machines. And once Gateway got down to only one AMD part, the decision was probably that it just wasn't worth the cost to maintain the extra vendor.

John



To: reynoso who wrote (144096)9/25/2001 1:48:12 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
RE:This sounds like more Intel chicanery - AMD is the low cost supplier - so why wouldn't Gateway go to AMD exclusively?"

The Chicanery is in the MHz...

Jim



To: reynoso who wrote (144096)9/26/2001 3:52:14 PM
From: Robert O  Respond to of 186894
 
re: This sounds like more Intel chicanery - AMD is the low cost supplier - so why wouldn't Gateway go to AMD exclusively?

Because, literally, the box says Intel Inside. Relative to brand appeal it's a better deal. Oh much better. You never see AMD Inside do you? They blew it on marketing and now it appears all may be lost. AMD is the Tab to Intel's Coke.

RO