Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	9/25/2001 6:44:18 PM
From: robnhood	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Ho ho ho---- Are you telling me that a point and three quarters rise in yearly rates stopped these high flyers that went up 10% in a day ? Ho ho ho, You are nuts. The CFZ had this wild eyed bubble pegged for exactly what it was. If you still can't see that you need to buy more stock, and for sure your reluctant eyes will be peeled open, when you see the big fat Zero on your statements. PS; and when you want to buy more , we or some optioned insider will be only to pleased to accomodate you, Ho ho ho

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	9/25/2001 6:48:38 PM
From: reaper	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Dot.coms became over-valued because money was too TIGHT?? BGR, please PM me your mailing address so I may purchase you a copy of "Economics in One Lesson", as you surely need it. If you act within the next twenty minutes I'll even throw in a copy of Minsky's "Stabilizing and Unstable Economy" for free. How's that for value add?

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	9/25/2001 6:49:01 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

oh man, that one's a keeper ... we need to start a new thread to catalog this stuff. Sakes alive man! Alan Greenspan the evil doctor overdosing the economy the chemotherapy of high interest rates??? ... too much!

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	9/25/2001 6:59:51 PM
From: SouthFloridaGuy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

<<Point is, they were not overvalued, but became so under tight monetary policies.>> You're joking, right? You must have gotten killed in the last year.

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	9/25/2001 7:43:24 PM
From: MythMan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

I'm pleased to see you still provide great humor to the SI threads...keep up the good work.

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	10/24/2001 11:18:50 PM
From: LLCF	Respond to of 436258

< Point is, they were not overvalued, but became so under tight monetary policies. > ROFLMAO!!! So why aren't they back where they were??? Are you still saying there was no bubble?? EVERYONE has given up on that claim but you, quite remarkable actually. DAK

To: BGR who wrote (125607)	10/25/2001 4:13:27 PM
From: At_The_Ask	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Youre a goof bro. Read a little about the history of the markets before you venture to make calls about the value of equities. I cant say if the indexes will go up or down from here to an absolute certainty. But I can say that stocks were overvalued before 2000 and many are still overvalued today. They yield less than nothing when adjusted for inflation. the fact that you are so smug about your positions leads me to believe that they will likely deteriorate further. You are welcome to your own opinion but you need not be an ass. -GFY-