Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (29484)	9/26/2001 12:24:44 AM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

csi.ad.jp People should go and see what they are talking about before advocating the usage. I recommend the Atomic Museum. I was there and I can tell you it is a very somber place. Every American should go there to understand what we have done. Okay, millions of servicemen saved (an untestable number BTW), but these were non-combatants. That is one way to win a war.

To: epicure who wrote (29484)	9/26/2001 12:37:22 AM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

X, we didn't intervene militarily because Tibet was not a vital enough American interest to start a major war over. In such a war more people would have been killed then where killed by the Chinese invasion and subsequent oppression in Tibet. A land war in China (and at the least accessible part of China not the coastal areas where our naval superiority could be useful) would have to have a really, really big reason. Even if it was US deaths. If China gave shelter to Bin Laden we would try to convince them to stop and then if they continued to protect him we would try to isolate them and punish them in every diplomatic and economic way we can. We would start a new cold war, but we would not be likely to invade China. Something like that is just too big. Tim