Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike M2 who wrote (125753)	9/26/2001 11:45:33 AM
From: oldirtybastard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

they are necessary in the city too, if someone breaks in I need to shoot them with something, shotguns work well, if they hear you rack it and keep coming look out though -g-

To: Mike M2 who wrote (125753)	9/26/2001 11:56:43 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

Bill, could understand special situations, but in general I think that carrying fire arms was legitimate over 100 years ago when police forces were meager or almost non. But today why should I need a handgun in a city?? it may only bring trouble. Also the idea of having guns in the cockpit is strange ........ any terrorist will know were the weapons are ...... aside what if a bullet hits a window which blows out ???? Better security, and retina, face and fingerprint recognition are much safer than guns in cockpits. BWDIK Haim