Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: milo_morai who wrote (56506)	9/27/2001 2:53:25 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Milo, why get so upset? Is it because you still don't know how to back up from this statement? "they [Intel] do have allot of unused fabs. Intel has shifted allot of personal from Flash to CPU fabs. Flash fabs are almost vacant in some areas." All I have asked is for you to explain it. You said that D1C is "the CPU fab in question", but that doesn't seem to address your original statement. Now, why don't you quit dodging around the topic, and finally confront your comment. Does Intel have unused fabs, or did you make an error in your statement? Stop sporting around first hand knowledge, when it clearly does not defend your original statement. wanna_bmw

To: milo_morai who wrote (56506)	9/27/2001 3:22:19 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Milo, Re: "D1C is nolonger a develpment fab. It's is in production on 300mm, 130nm, Cu interconnects and is in the final stages of qualification. It produces only P4 Xeons & P4. So my 1st hand knowledge makes you look like a fl." You are obviously the fl. If D1C were currently in production on 300mm wafers, why hasn't Intel announced this milestone? If it is only producing P4 chips, where are the .13u P4s that it is making? Production and qualification are two different things. Better recheck your sources. wanna_bmw