SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dalin who wrote (42613)9/27/2001 6:29:45 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Interesting IBD story today...

Feature Story

Thursday, September 27, 2001

Behind Radical Muslim Discontent: Economic Failure Of Modern Islam

By Peter Benesh

Investor's Business Daily

A great swath of humanity — 1.3 billion people, or one-fifth of the world’s population — lives in countries where Islam is the dominant or state religion. Most are poor.

They’re less educated than Westerners. They live shorter lives. Infant mortality is higher.

By any measure, modern Islam is an economic failure. Most Islamic countries are locked in a struggle between a glorious past and a grim present. Angry militants blame the U.S. and Europe for this.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Image: Islam's Poverty

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scholars see a pattern based as much on psychology as theology. Radical Muslims blame their poverty on those with more wealth. Those who have wealth must be taking it away from those who have less.

Once Dominant

Islam once dominated the world — at least the world centered on the Mediterranean and its trade routes. Cordoba and Granada in Spain were ancient centers of Islamic learning, symbols of prosperity and influence.

But that was 1,000 years ago. The Moors lost Spain to the Christians in 1492. Today, Moroccans, Algerians and Tunisians sneak into Europe by boat to find opportunities.

The Ottoman Empire, rooted in what is now Turkey, once reached Vienna, Austria. The last vestige of Ottoman rule in Europe - in the Balkans - ended 80 years ago. Its vestiges sparked the Balkan wars of the last decade.

How did a civilization that gave the world its numeric system, transliterated Aristotle and opened trade routes to the Orient wind up in such an economic mess despite its vast riches of resources?

Basic Disconnect

The answer lies in a brew of royalty, psychology, history, myth and theology, scholars say.

Muslims are unable to reconcile a basic disconnect, says professor Akbar Ahmed of American University in Washington, D.C.

“They say to themselves: ‘We are not poor people. We have oil. We have resources. Why is it being mismanaged? Why are our leaders not able to organize our lives so we can live as good human beings and good Muslims?’ ” he said.

One answer lies in the myth of their lost glory, he says.

“Muslims have a feeling of having achieved so much over 1,000 years, up to the period of European colonization in the 19th and early 20th centuries. They expected they would take off and achieve something,” Ahmed said. Instead, the Muslim world is falling behind.

A root problem is that most of the wealth is in the hands of royalty or dictators, Ahmed says. “There is prosperity for some. The standard of living there can rank with European countries. But it’s all clustered at the top.”

That’s a key cause of anger, he says. “A radical in the Muslim world is attacking primarily his own establishment,” Ahmed said.

“Fundamentalists identify their own corrupt governments with the West. They say to themselves, ‘We have crooks ruling us and behind them you have the Western powers,’ ” he said.

Reformation Wanted

Economic misery is also a product of ignorance, says Paul Kurtz, emeritus professor of philosophy at State University of New York in Buffalo.

“Islam needs a reformation, a renaissance. Islam desperately needs to come into the modern world,” he said. “Islam is based on developments in the seventh and eighth centuries. It is based on nomadic and agricultural civilizations. Fundamentalist forces want to return to that era. For them, religion becomes the be-all and end-all,” Kurtz said.

In 46 Islamic countries, those who want to modernize are at odds with fundamentalists, he says.

“The economic hardships they suffer result from inadequate education. Unless they develop science, technology and expand university curricula to include all subjects and allow freedom of inquiry, they’ll find it difficult to advance,” he said.

“Look at Egypt. The population is growing by leaps and bounds. The government would like to modernize, but fears the mobs spurred by the fundamentalists,” he said.

A key factor is the union of theology and government, he says. “There’s no separation of mosque and state except in Turkey, which became secular in 1923. But even there the military is always on guard against Islamic fundamentalists,” he said.

Militant Islamists are driven by a vision of their faith that goes back almost 1,500 years, Kurtz says. “Thirty years after Mohammed (570-632) died, his followers took Syria, Palestine and Egypt. Within 80 years they had reached both the Atlantic and the Indian oceans.”

Missionary Zeal

“Now it’s a missionary religion. The principle of jihad is that, in the name of Allah, you can kill anything that endangers Islam,” Kurtz said.

A chance for economic improvement in Islamic countries rests with the children of Muslim families in the West, Kurtz says.

“With 7 million Muslims in France, 3 million in Germany and 7 million in the U.S., I hope their kids who go on to university will find enlightenment and take their knowledge back,” he said.

It’s not a certain thing, he says. “Some of the second generation are breaking away, but some are going back to Islam.”

The oil sheiks proclaim their wealth as a benefit from God, says John Voll, professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University in Washington, D.C. That belief sustains an elite and hinders development, he says.

Whose Oil Is It?

“The elite see oil as God’s gift of prosperity to the royal families in Saudi Arabia and the (United Arab) Emirates. They claim it is Islamic to keep that wealth to themselves because God gave them the stuff,” he said.

“Muslims have a sense that something went wrong. They have tried to do something about it. There was a century of reform in the 19th and early 20th century,” he said.

He cited Kemal Ataturk (1881-1938) and Gamel Abdel Nasser (1918-1970). Ataturk, Turkey’s first president after the Ottoman Empire’s fall, separated mosque and state.

Nasser deposed Egypt’s monarchy and seized the Suez Canal. His bid to launch a union of Arab states failed.

At Your Own Peril

Modernizing an Islamic country is risky. Radicals killed Egyptian President Anwar Sadat on Oct. 6, 1981, for his efforts.

“They tried to do something, but what they tried to do didn’t do them much good,” Voll said. By the 1970s people in the Islamic world saw that they had failed, he says. “They felt they had been defeated by the West.”

How did they make that leap?

“They tried radical socialist and Marxist ideology. That didn’t work,” Voll said. “Then they tried hard-nosed entrepreneurial reform. That didn’t work. So they thought maybe they were wrong to try copying the West.”

“They learned it wasn’t about just copying technology but also ways of thinking,” Voll said.

“This drove the intellectuals to say, ‘Maybe we are weak because we copy somebody else. Let’s go back to our roots,’ ” Voll said.

That led to a universal human tendency - blaming others for their own misfortunes, Voll says. “European and American imperialism became the scapegoat,” he said. And the shift to fundamentalism only made matters worse.

“Conservative religious rigidity, whether indigenous tribal, old-fashioned Christian or Muslim have been hindrances to economic development,” he said.

The Malaysian Example

One Islamic country is different, he says. That’s Malaysia. But it’s far from the Middle East and has a long history of trade.

“Embedded in the concept of a traditional Islamic society in Southeast Asia is a cosmopolitan tolerance and pluralism,” he said.

Malaysia is building an economy based on technology and education. Why is Malaysia not a model for the rest of the Islamic world?

“Malaysia is viewed by Muslims throughout the Islamic world as interesting but marginal,” Voll said. There’s no one to tell all Muslims to follow Malaysia’s example.

Islam is vague, Voll says. “It has no papacy and no church. It has mullahs who issue fatwas (edicts), but no formal institution to define what Islam means or says.”

Why Are We Behind?

The Muslim countries of the Middle East are shackled by their view of history, says Jere Bacharach, professor of international studies at the University of Washington, Seattle.

“Arabic-speaking Muslims believe God revealed his final truth in Arabic. Their influence once stretched from Spain to Central Asia. They said to themselves, ‘Clearly God favored us,’ ” Bacharach said.

“Now they ask, ‘Why are we so far behind?’ The reason, they say, is, ‘We don’t have the faith of our founders. If we go back to the values of the founders, we will have the glory we once had.’

“Of course, they cannot go back to the early 700s,” he said.



To: Dalin who wrote (42613)9/27/2001 7:30:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 65232
 
A Good editorial by William Safire in today's NY Times

September 27, 2001

ESSAY

All Is Not Changed

By WILLIAM SAFIRE

WASHINGTON -- Legend has it that when Lord Cornwallis formally surrendered to General Washington at Yorktown, ending the Revolutionary War, the redcoated band played "The World Turned Upside Down."

The same song is being played today in the aftermath of the September massacre. Life will never be the same, we are told with dreary unanimity. From now on, everything will be different. We have to learn to live with dread.

No more sense of security in skyscrapers or airplanes; no more carefree days cheering at the Super Bowl; no more driving on a bridge or through a tunnel without a frisson of fear that the truck ahead may be driven by a suicidal maniac. Confidence in our personal safety is supposedly a thing of the past.

The notion that "everything has changed" ripples outward: this loss of our sense of security about our very lives spreads to worry about our livelihoods. As the fallout from fear curtails travel, will I lose my job near the airport or making beds at the resort? Will the ebb of consumer confidence depress the stock market and plunge us into deep recession and snatch away the security of my retirement funds? Do I dare start a new enterprise in this climate, or even bring a new baby into this vale of fears?

Now for a message from the poet Milton: "Hence, loathed Melancholy!" True, we have a right to be outraged at the death of our 7,000, murdered only for the sin of being free and happily productive Americans. And we have an obligation to support their families in their bereavement and to wipe out the state sponsors of their killers.

We have no cause, however, to wallow in what is becoming a fashionable dread, and no reason to assume the doom of our personal security and national prosperity.

This debilitating dread is abetted by the belated warnings from agencies that failed to protect us. A chagrined Justice Department and C.I.A. — which neglected to use present authority to work closely with immigration and customs officials — now cover up past misfeasance with demands for more intrusive police powers to eavesdrop on and detain suspects.

On top of a panicky rush to eliminate rights, too many of us are afflicted with a "nameless, unreasoning and unjustified terror," in F.D.R.'s words, of seeming to be complacent about the terrorist threat. This catch-up alarmism contributes to the "terrorist mastermind" theory that focuses on Osama bin Laden as the central villain. It is simpler and less controversial than exposing the far greater nuclear and bio-war threat based in states using terrorists as their launch pads.

Suicide hijackers and bombers do not pose what is coolly called an existential threat to — that is, a danger to the very existence of — the United States. We lose 7,000 lives on our highways every two months. Terror-sponsoring states use these human missiles to implant that debilitating dread in individual American minds, thereby causing us to curtail our freedoms and to implore our leaders to appease the terrorists.

That is not going to happen. The blow to our body politic of Sept. 11 is not a knockout blow. We will brace ourselves for other murders already probably set in train, until we force the nations supporting terrorists to turn their agents over. Every new offense creates its fierce counteroffensive, and we are not going to let their new weapon change our lives permanently.

Airliners will be hijacker-proofed and private pilots deeply vetted. New York's ground zero will be rebuilt and Washington's Pentagon repaired. Our coming deficit will stimulate the economy, and the smart money on Wall Street will gobble up shares months before the upturn. The Redskins will not make it to the Super Bowl but two other teams will.

And we'll shake off that dread. Americans will return to our future's normalcy (no, President Warren G. Harding didn't coin the word), which will be no more or less safe than the present. Our children's world will be rightside up.

I believe that especially on this somber Day of Atonement, as Jews ask God to seal their names in a symbolic book. It is not a book of fear or lamentation. In an ageless affirmation of hope, we call it the Book of Life.

nytimes.com.