SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (132000)9/27/2001 10:06:43 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>It just seems there are a lot of people claiming to short after a stock has fallen or claiming to be long after a stock has risen.
Who gives a sh$t what people claim? During the 1849 california gold rush a lot of gold miners made claims to mines that ended up worthless.
My point is only once in a awhile will an investor end up with a real GEM. As as a Jeweler you should know the difference.



To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (132000)9/28/2001 9:02:29 AM
From: Alomex  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
It just seems there are a lot of people claiming to short after a stock has fallen or claiming to be long after a stock has risen. The claims often seem after the fact.

The unwritten rule should be that if you didn't post at the time you went short, then remain quiet forever. I'm short on three stocks (all of them in the black) but I only called the shot on AMZN, so that is the only one I have talked about here on SI.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News