SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nosmo_king who wrote (17078)9/28/2001 7:53:43 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh  Respond to of 22706
 
"that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter and that Reuters upholds the principle that we do not use the word terrorist . . ."

Seems like it would be more on the mark to call a terrorist a terrorist, even if they were on your own side.



To: nosmo_king who wrote (17078)9/28/2001 8:46:14 PM
From: Boa Babe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22706
 
<reading the FAQ>

It beats counting sheep.

As for an alternative to the term "terrorists", perhaps he can use "evil-doer" as one of our own did. None of it really matters to anyone who saw the planes hit the WTC. We know. If I had the chance I'd let uw teach me how to take that knife between my teeth...

cbb@letmeattem.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News