Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (30139)	9/28/2001 11:01:36 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

<I will wait for more evidence. > I can pretty much guarantee it is complex. All other domains of complex interaction known, whether electrons or particle, or quark or other entity, oscillate at some wavelength. The whole theory of quantum chromodynamics is dedicated to the spectral interpretation of quantum states. This is result of a system describable as a complex infinite series. This is why you can't generate impulses that don't last at least a certain minimum time in our universe. So, it appears in our universe that things have to last no less than a Planck time for mathematical consistency reasons (presuming that the information world is conservative). Given that speed light is the limiting parameter governing the macroscopic universe and the relationship between matter and light, the intermediate must exist at some integral multiple (for mathematical reinforcement reasons) of this minimum Planck time. So, the "existence" (the information state)is bound by the same limitations of time and space. So, I can tell you that the "states" of the intermediate(s) is(are) there for at least a Planck time and be of a size no smaller than a Planck size. We now have a lower limit for gao seng's stuff that isn't there. Now that we know how tiny it isn't we can start to define it in spectral terms. Every object at that scale or bigger is describable in spectral terms, which necessarily means that there is some parts of it there and some parts that aren't. Even "proton-ness" and "neutron-ness" become describable only in probablistic terms.