Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gao seng who wrote (30159)	9/28/2001 9:59:56 PM
From: Mac Con Ulaidh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

You don't think he would have? Yes, you would. Think about it. All the world... in balance... depending on your decision. I think you would. If you wouldn't, I would. What is one soul next to the world? It is nothing. Why wouldn't you?

To: gao seng who wrote (30159)	9/28/2001 10:08:46 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Maybe for the fanatics within Islam we could have a round of "DEVO"... not meant to denote devotion <gg> Are we not men ? We are D E V O ! (de-evolution) ;-) PS: Mohammed was very demanding of his private "space" and yet was extremely clever knowing the world had become more modern so chose to only become a "Prophet of Allah" not the "Son of God " which eventually gets done away with as the world progresses . It's amazing that Christianity pulls off the ruse as long as it has . But being only a "Man" allowed for Mohammed to order many deaths of those that resisted the "Revelation of God "....which was a very clever thing indeed . He was allowed this for being only the "messenger" etc .... I chose not ever to become a follower of Islam either ... too much my soul will not accept ...Prophets that are also murderers , i would not ever follow.