SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: milo_morai who wrote (56701)9/29/2001 2:03:49 AM
From: wanna_bmwRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Milo, I know. It also has CPUMark32, Norton SI-32, and the Intel Media Benchmark, all weighted to Intel's best advantage, to be sure.

But your point was to prove that previous Intel generations had an IPC advantage over previous ones. I hope you realize that by using an obviously biased benchmark such as this one, that it would be terribly hard for you to argue the validity of similar benchmarks in the future.

But let me be more specific. Others on this thread like to argue about the validity of certain benchmarks... SPEC, Quake III, and SysMark 2001, mostly, because they happen to favor the Intel platform. I'm not here to offer any comment on these today, but if you are going to use iCOMP for proof in your argument, I hope that you don't participate in benchmark bashing in the future, and still pretend not to be hypocritical.

wanna_bmw



To: milo_morai who wrote (56701)10/2/2001 1:55:24 AM
From: Joe NYCRespond to of 275872
 
Milo,

iComp has SPEC in it or didn't you read the fine print?

It is interesting that the iComp benchmarks are still on Intel web site. Wasn't there some kind of class action law suit about Intel inflating the scores by something like using other upgraded peripherals. My recollection is not clear, but Intel ended up pulling iComp from all their promotional literature.

Joe