Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (213)	9/30/2001 4:29:36 PM
From: gao seng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15516

Where was this fear when Osam bombed the WTC in '93?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (213)	9/30/2001 4:41:51 PM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 15516

Tp, It seems to me that there are a bunch of illiterates posting here that cannot read the heading of this thread.Posters are supposed to be Democrats. Maybe all these guys are closet Democrats!!!! LOL......nah......only Republicans would be so hateful and discourteous. Pat

To: TigerPaw who wrote (213)	9/30/2001 10:22:08 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15516

Are you aware (OF COURSE NOT!) that the President and Congress would go into safe underground bunkers in case of nuclear war? This has applied to every President, Republican and Democrat alike, for decades. How is this so different? It IS the job of the Secret Service to keep the President safe; they do try to do their job. Would it have improved the situation (from the point of view of us normal folks, not that of single-minded idiots) for the President to be killed on 9/11? Don't you (yes, EVEN YOU!) think that had the President been killed by these monsters it would have significantly increase the chance of a large, rapid military response? What cowards and traitors like you want so much to avoid?