Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (15371)	10/1/2001 12:47:47 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu	Respond to of 197214

>>The point of my original response to you was that there is now evidence of faster reaction times for those exposed to radio waves emitted by cell phones. << I am going to tape a couple of them on my head.. May be a gprs phone too..

To: A.J. Mullen who wrote (15371)	10/1/2001 7:33:55 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197214

Ashley, sorry for that. I read your comment incorrectly. The physiological effects, assuming there are any that are measurable, would certainly show up LESS in a CDMA based system, for a number of reasons discussed earlier. Since existing research studies apparently do not distinguish between CDMA or GSM or TDMA, or even analog, which would likely have much stronger effects than digital, it is really premature to give any credibility even to a hypothesis that there is or is not a significant effect. Additionally, we are talking about dosages so small (in the case of CDMA) that there might be no way to measure any effects without continuing exposure for a period of years, during which time I'm sure we all will encounter greater risks from our water supplies, insecticides, chemical fertilizers, and cars. Art