Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Green who wrote (78834)	10/1/2001 2:31:39 PM
From: Andre Williamson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Re:What an upgrade! Even the latest hardware may not work right under Windows XP, and programs may have problems, too. Right. I forgot that the upgrade process, with each new round of technology, software, and peripherals, promises to be an increasing headache. For computers I bought in 1983, 1984, 1987, 1994, and 1996 the only peripherals I had were a printer, and (earlier on) an external floppy drive and a cassette drive. Software I used was pretty much limited to word processor, spreadsheet, and a few games. My 1998 upgraded machine also occasionally had a scanner and PalmPilot attached. My 2000-purchased machine has to handle a Palm cradle, an analog-video conversion peripheral, a USB-hub, a CF drive, a 1994 legacy HP laserjet printer, a photo scanner, a slide scanner, an Audible-enabled mp3 player, an external cable modem...and that's just the hardware. I've got at least 5x10 times as many software applications on my machine as I did 5 years ago. The first 5 upgrades were pretty simple replacements, each time to a faster computer that could do more things. But an upgrade now has come to mean a new machine that requires 2-3 days of hardware and software installation. (Last year's new machine 'upgrade' took about 1-1/2 days). To give you an idea, I bought a Dell last year just before Windows ME came out; Dell shipped me a copy of the software a month later. I never bothered installing it, though, because of the amount of time I knew it would take to reinstall/troubleshoot all the hardware and software, and because of the horrible reviews of (in)compatibility with Windows ME. Bottom line: Even new killer may be unable by themselves to cause users to jump at an upgrade. The 'MS factor' (upgrade time and headaches), which a decade ago wasn't much of an issue, needs to be taken into account as well. Andre