Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Americans 4 "No Own - No Sell" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: joseph krinsky who wrote (86)	10/1/2001 2:49:35 PM
From: Mark L.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 455

The post that I was responding to said this: "This is not about facts, due diligence ro anything fundamentally. This si about get capitulation and covering then laughing at the stupidity of the American Investor. It is easy get sells ... Impression management and manipulation of the media thus creating a clear path to manipulate the market. The bottomline is once they have accomplished total destruction of public opinion they buy into the selling covering and then going long in some cases. They shut up about the security and let the longs bring in buyers so at some point they can sell their long position and then short it back down with bashers killing public opinion confidence again." It appears that there is not a single example of such a thing. As you say, every stock has been shorted at one time or another. But it appears that no good company has ever been targeted by these "short-selling cartels". I don't know that to be a fact, but it appears that way, given Ga Bard's unwillingness to back up his assertion with a single example. By contrast, it appears that hundreds of stock swindles have been targeted by these "short-selling cartels".