SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (55478)10/1/2001 4:44:31 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Respond to of 94695
 
Wrong. Unless one borrows against the house beyond what is prudent given the risk/return characteristics of the real estate, and then invests the loan proceeds in the stock market, one is NOT "in effect on margin". Or are your broadening the definition of margin to include financial leverage of any asset, rather than just securities? Your explanation of the riskiness of large mortgage debts supported by possibly inflated real estate prices may make a valid point, but only about the risks of real estate, not those of the stock market.

Bob

PS: I'm in the process of refinancing at 6%, but I have no desire to use these low rates to buy one of the new $800k+ houses being built near me, regardless of how nice they are. Perhaps when their overleveraged initial buyers goes bust, I'll pick one up for a half million, but only if I want to part with half the price in cash. For now, I'll keep my money in select stocks. :-)



To: James F. Hopkins who wrote (55478)10/1/2001 5:58:50 PM
From: William H Huebl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
As long as we have inflation, rather than deflation, and you can get a fixed mortgage around 6% as we have I think it is better to have a mortgage, whether you need it or not. Then whenever inflation ticks back up, you are looking at bonanza for the home buyer.