Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (5573)	10/1/2001 3:59:01 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

<< The facts are very clear: Palestine would have had to concede a lot, Israel would have to concede very little. >> Nonsense. All that the Palestinians would have to concede is a pledge not to constantly attack and kill innocent Jewish men, women and children. All Israel wants is to live in peace. I watch the news about the Palestinians blowing up children in Pizza places and teenage dances. I hope that Israel never offers land for peace again. << And, all of what Israel would concede was land grabbed by military force after 1948. >> Not true. Israel only used military force in self defense, and only captured Arab land, after being threatened with extermination by the racist Arab nations. I just wish that Israel had taken more land from the racist Arabs. Israel is a civilized, peace loving nation, who would be a good neighbor to any other country, providing that country wasn't full of blind racist hatred, like the Palestinians and Arab nations. Who the hell, in their right mind, would want the Palestinians for neighbors!? Praise be to God that the Palestinians are thousands of miles from the US.