Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (132259)	10/1/2001 7:07:42 PM
From: Alomex	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

so you label it as propaganda, giving you a convenient excuse for ignoring what is said. Craig would never admit to a point. When confronted with the facts suddenly he forgets the reasons of bankruptcy and they have to be spelled out, or a ready equivocation comes in handy, you name it. All rhetorical escapes from an inevitable logical conclusion.

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (132259)	10/1/2001 7:43:45 PM
From: craig crawford	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>> You don't want to consider the possibility that free trade << how would you know? how do you know what i have considered and what i haven't considered? perhaps i considered all those ideas and rejected them! >> so you label it as propaganda, giving you a convenient excuse for ignoring what is said. << i will gladly debate you on the merits of free trade vs protectionism. i happen to think that most all govts spew propaganda, that doesn't mean i can't explain to you why i think your ideas are wrong. btw, how is calling pat buchanan "patzi" and branding him a racist or fascist any different than me saying i don't believe your govt and transnational corporation propaganda? we both have made our feelings known, you on pat buchanan, me on govts and new world order proponents. now quit your famous tactic of nitpicking minutia like dates or dollar amounts and stop obfuscating the real issue which is interventionism and globalization vs protectionism and nationalism. you are afraid to get down to the real nitty gritty of the issues because you know you have no solid foundation to support your argument, so you choose to avoid the real issue and focus on side issues which are meaningless. forget who wrote the articles i posted and focus on what was said. you would have a lot more credibility if you stopped trying to trash pat buchanan and you actually debunked his ideas.