SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: j g cordes who wrote (34558)10/1/2001 9:48:33 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Respond to of 68166
 
Worth magazine Desert Bloom


Desert Bloom
by Melissa Phipps October 2001, Worth Magazine
Contract manufacturers are positioning themselves for growth during the technology downturn
In 1996, Patrick Renda ditched a career producing television sports and joined money manager J.&W. Seligman. With no formal investment training, Renda was assigned coverage of a group that received scant Wall Street attention: contract manufacturers, companies that take on spillover assembly from technology equipment makers such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard. "There was a lot of misunderstanding about the potential there," he says, "and not a lot of respect." Since the burst of the technology bubble, however, the fortunes of marque hardware makers have waned, and outsourcing has emerged as one of the few dependable trends in the sector. "Contract manufacturers are an intelligent way to play technology," Renda says.

Today firms such as Flextronics, Sanmina, and Celestica offer an increasingly sophisticated lineup of services that help companies shorten product cycles, lower costs, and globalize production. Currently, less than 20 percent of the $650 billion electronics equipment market is outsourced; that figure could one day climb to 60 percent or more. For investors, that means it will become increasingly easy to gain exposure to a broad array of new technologies by owning a single stock.

There are near-term risks, however. Contract manufacturers derive about half of their revenue from battered telecom and datacom companies. The largest players — Sanmina, Flextronics, Celestica, and Solectron — are taking restructuring charges, bracing for customer bankruptcies, and laying off workers. Solectron has estimated restructuring charges of about $628 million for the three quarters ended in August. Through mid-August, Merrill Lynch's index of contract manufacturers was down 31 percent, versus the Nasdaq's 21 percent drop.

But contract manufacturers are managing the downturn better than their customers. Cisco and Nokia are both off about 55 percent, and Nortel is off 79 percent. "During the worst tech correction in history, many of these guys are still making a 10 percent return on invested capital," says Robertson Stephens analyst Keith Dunne.

If approved, recent mergers should help newly combined players broaden their client base. Sanmina announced it would pay $6 billion in stock and assumed debt for competitor SCI Systems, which would make it the industry's second-biggest participant and offer needed exposure to medical, industrial, and consumer electronics. Solectron plans to acquire C-MAC for $2.7 billion in part to access its rival's business in automotive electronics. The market could be worth $9 billion by 2004.

Brutal market conditions appear to be reinforcing the outsourcing trend. Business at troubled Lucent is down about 20 percent this year, but the telecom company recently awarded Celestica a five-year, $10 billion contract to become a leading supplier of switching and wireless networking products. Unless Lucent goes out of business, Celestica shouldn't get stuck with unsold products if demand continues to fall. That's because Celestica and its large peers have gained the leverage to refuse any inventory risk in their contracts. This year, Cisco and Nortel have taken inventory write-offs of $2.2 billion and $1 billion, respectively; the big contract manufacturers have much lower exposure.

Now these large contract manufacturers are expanding their reach by bringing suppliers in-house and offering design, distribution, and other services. Last year, Flextronics struck an unprecedented deal with Microsoft to manufacture and help design Xbox video game consoles. It reportedly will receive $300 for each unit — the same amount as the Xbox's expected retail price (Microsoft is taking a loss in the hope of selling more software). In January, Flextronics secured a deal worth $2 billion to $3 billion a year to take over Ericsson's entire cell phone manufacturing operations.

The trend toward vertical integration can boost profit margins, but it requires digesting a lot of acquisitions and divestitures quickly and efficiently. For example, Flextronics has acquired more than 35 operations in the past two years. That's a lot to integrate, and given the low margins in this business, there's little room to stumble.

Midsize player Jabil Circuit is a more straightforward investment. Jabil has taken on only a few divestitures and has no designs on becoming vertically integrated. Yet revenue growth since 1997 has outpaced the industry average of 43 percent. Jabil is smaller than the top-tier competition but large enough to compete on price; it also maintains one of the lowest net debt to capital ratios in the industry. Recently, Jabil struck a $4 billion outsourcing deal with telecom equipment maker Marconi.

Plexus, a small-cap player with less exposure to communications technology, may also be a smart alternative to the consolidating giants. With half its revenue coming from medical, industrial, and automotive contracts, Plexus has the widest array of customers in the industry. Unlike its bigger peers, the company doesn't compete in low-margin, high-volume production; instead, it manufactures high-margin specialty products such as ultrasound equipment. In the nine months ended in June, Plexus's revenue increased 60 percent over the same period last year, to $805.6 million, and its net income rose 21 percent to $34.7 million. This year through mid-August, its stock was up 8 percent, the industry's strongest performance.

With inventory levels high and end-market demand uncertain, shares of both large and small contract manufacturers could fall further in the near term. Analysts say Flextronics and Jabil are the most vulnerable given their valuations of more than 30 times estimated 2001 earnings. But investors won't want to risk getting left behind, Seligman's Patrick Renda says. If history is any guide, he's right. The best year ever for contract manufacturing stocks was 1992, when the sector grew 119 percent coming out of a recession. —Melissa Phipps

Broader Is Better: Customer Composition Of Top Contract Manufacturers Name Stock Price Countries/
Facilities Top 10 Cust.
Exposure Telecom
Exposure Other¹
Exposure
CELESTICA
(NYSE: CLS) $40.54 11/37 83% 33% 0%
FLEXTRONICS
(NASDAQ: FLEX) $23.42 27/171 60 54 17
JABIL CIRCUIT
(NYSE: JBL) $25.99 10/26 67.5 44 14
PLEXUS
(NASDAQ: PLXS) $33.41 4/21 50 40 50
SANMINA*
(NASDAQ: SANM) $20.31 12/67 54 77 9
SCI SYSTEMS*
(NYSE: SCI) $27.00 19/53 75 25 18
SOLECTRON**
(NYSE: SLR) $14.35 24/69 65 65 11

Stock data as of 8/16/01.
Sources: Robertson Stephens; Merrill Lynch.
¹Consumer, Medical, Industrial Electronics
*Does not reflect Sanmina's proposed acquisition of SCI Systems
**Does not reflect proposed acquisition of C-MAC.


worth.com



To: j g cordes who wrote (34558)10/1/2001 9:48:33 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Respond to of 68166
 
Worth magazine Desert Bloom


Desert Bloom
by Melissa Phipps October 2001, Worth Magazine
Contract manufacturers are positioning themselves for growth during the technology downturn
In 1996, Patrick Renda ditched a career producing television sports and joined money manager J.&W. Seligman. With no formal investment training, Renda was assigned coverage of a group that received scant Wall Street attention: contract manufacturers, companies that take on spillover assembly from technology equipment makers such as IBM and Hewlett-Packard. "There was a lot of misunderstanding about the potential there," he says, "and not a lot of respect." Since the burst of the technology bubble, however, the fortunes of marque hardware makers have waned, and outsourcing has emerged as one of the few dependable trends in the sector. "Contract manufacturers are an intelligent way to play technology," Renda says.

Today firms such as Flextronics, Sanmina, and Celestica offer an increasingly sophisticated lineup of services that help companies shorten product cycles, lower costs, and globalize production. Currently, less than 20 percent of the $650 billion electronics equipment market is outsourced; that figure could one day climb to 60 percent or more. For investors, that means it will become increasingly easy to gain exposure to a broad array of new technologies by owning a single stock.

There are near-term risks, however. Contract manufacturers derive about half of their revenue from battered telecom and datacom companies. The largest players — Sanmina, Flextronics, Celestica, and Solectron — are taking restructuring charges, bracing for customer bankruptcies, and laying off workers. Solectron has estimated restructuring charges of about $628 million for the three quarters ended in August. Through mid-August, Merrill Lynch's index of contract manufacturers was down 31 percent, versus the Nasdaq's 21 percent drop.

But contract manufacturers are managing the downturn better than their customers. Cisco and Nokia are both off about 55 percent, and Nortel is off 79 percent. "During the worst tech correction in history, many of these guys are still making a 10 percent return on invested capital," says Robertson Stephens analyst Keith Dunne.

If approved, recent mergers should help newly combined players broaden their client base. Sanmina announced it would pay $6 billion in stock and assumed debt for competitor SCI Systems, which would make it the industry's second-biggest participant and offer needed exposure to medical, industrial, and consumer electronics. Solectron plans to acquire C-MAC for $2.7 billion in part to access its rival's business in automotive electronics. The market could be worth $9 billion by 2004.

Brutal market conditions appear to be reinforcing the outsourcing trend. Business at troubled Lucent is down about 20 percent this year, but the telecom company recently awarded Celestica a five-year, $10 billion contract to become a leading supplier of switching and wireless networking products. Unless Lucent goes out of business, Celestica shouldn't get stuck with unsold products if demand continues to fall. That's because Celestica and its large peers have gained the leverage to refuse any inventory risk in their contracts. This year, Cisco and Nortel have taken inventory write-offs of $2.2 billion and $1 billion, respectively; the big contract manufacturers have much lower exposure.

Now these large contract manufacturers are expanding their reach by bringing suppliers in-house and offering design, distribution, and other services. Last year, Flextronics struck an unprecedented deal with Microsoft to manufacture and help design Xbox video game consoles. It reportedly will receive $300 for each unit — the same amount as the Xbox's expected retail price (Microsoft is taking a loss in the hope of selling more software). In January, Flextronics secured a deal worth $2 billion to $3 billion a year to take over Ericsson's entire cell phone manufacturing operations.

The trend toward vertical integration can boost profit margins, but it requires digesting a lot of acquisitions and divestitures quickly and efficiently. For example, Flextronics has acquired more than 35 operations in the past two years. That's a lot to integrate, and given the low margins in this business, there's little room to stumble.

Midsize player Jabil Circuit is a more straightforward investment. Jabil has taken on only a few divestitures and has no designs on becoming vertically integrated. Yet revenue growth since 1997 has outpaced the industry average of 43 percent. Jabil is smaller than the top-tier competition but large enough to compete on price; it also maintains one of the lowest net debt to capital ratios in the industry. Recently, Jabil struck a $4 billion outsourcing deal with telecom equipment maker Marconi.

Plexus, a small-cap player with less exposure to communications technology, may also be a smart alternative to the consolidating giants. With half its revenue coming from medical, industrial, and automotive contracts, Plexus has the widest array of customers in the industry. Unlike its bigger peers, the company doesn't compete in low-margin, high-volume production; instead, it manufactures high-margin specialty products such as ultrasound equipment. In the nine months ended in June, Plexus's revenue increased 60 percent over the same period last year, to $805.6 million, and its net income rose 21 percent to $34.7 million. This year through mid-August, its stock was up 8 percent, the industry's strongest performance.

With inventory levels high and end-market demand uncertain, shares of both large and small contract manufacturers could fall further in the near term. Analysts say Flextronics and Jabil are the most vulnerable given their valuations of more than 30 times estimated 2001 earnings. But investors won't want to risk getting left behind, Seligman's Patrick Renda says. If history is any guide, he's right. The best year ever for contract manufacturing stocks was 1992, when the sector grew 119 percent coming out of a recession. —Melissa Phipps

Broader Is Better: Customer Composition Of Top Contract Manufacturers Name Stock Price Countries/
Facilities Top 10 Cust.
Exposure Telecom
Exposure Other¹
Exposure
CELESTICA
(NYSE: CLS) $40.54 11/37 83% 33% 0%
FLEXTRONICS
(NASDAQ: FLEX) $23.42 27/171 60 54 17
JABIL CIRCUIT
(NYSE: JBL) $25.99 10/26 67.5 44 14
PLEXUS
(NASDAQ: PLXS) $33.41 4/21 50 40 50
SANMINA*
(NASDAQ: SANM) $20.31 12/67 54 77 9
SCI SYSTEMS*
(NYSE: SCI) $27.00 19/53 75 25 18
SOLECTRON**
(NYSE: SLR) $14.35 24/69 65 65 11

Stock data as of 8/16/01.
Sources: Robertson Stephens; Merrill Lynch.
¹Consumer, Medical, Industrial Electronics
*Does not reflect Sanmina's proposed acquisition of SCI Systems
**Does not reflect proposed acquisition of C-MAC.


worth.com



To: j g cordes who wrote (34558)10/1/2001 10:08:59 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Respond to of 68166
 
I am not sure when this article was written, but we have hit the target for this fund that shorts for some of these stocks.

Stock Target Price Today
ACF 10 30.84
JNPR 5 9.29
BRCM 15 18.77
KBH 15 27.93
CIEN 7 9.82
NVDA 25 25.14
GNTX 8 22.33
TMP 20 37.60

*********************




Withering Heights
October 2001, Worth Magazine
These eight stocks are riding on unsustainable market valuations
David Tice doesn't stand for any bull. A value investor at heart, the manager of the $140 million Prudent Bear Fund shorts companies whose valuations, he believes, are unsustainable because of deteriorating growth prospects, decelerating earnings, or accounting shenanigans. As stocks have declined, his strategy has come in from the cold: Prudent Bear returned 35 percent in the 12 months ended August 16, versus a 20 percent decline for the S&P 500. Tice thinks Broadcom, Ciena, and Juniper Networks have further to fall because of the overcapacity in the telecom sector. "The buildout was a onetime thing," he says. Meanwhile, the core businesses of TMP Worldwide and Gentex are both faltering. The fortunes of AmeriCredit and KB Home are tied to the U.S. consumer, who, Tice says, is "dramatically overleveraged." A pessimist, yes. But in a market beset by uncertainty, Tice's no-bull approach is a constructive guide. — Reshma Memon Yaqub
AMERICREDIT
ACF
FORT WORTH NYSE

JUNIPER NETWORKS
JNPR
SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA NASDAQ


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$10 $57
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT
$5 $20
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rapid earnings growth and low interest rates have fueled the rise in this subprime lender's stock. But its customer base of high-credit-risk used-car buyers is creating danger as loan defaults pick up. The company is allowing more payment extensions. Juniper has chipped away at Cisco's dominance of the market for high-end routers, but Cisco is fighting back, and competitor Avici may offer a cheaper product with more capacity. Juniper's stock is priced as though it could take the entire market (it can't).

BROADCOM
BRCM
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA NASDAQ

KB HOME
KBH
LOS ANGELES NYSE


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$15 $41
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT
$15 $28
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The semiconductor maker's weakened stock is no longer effective currency, hurting the company's ability to acquire new technologies. It has diluted its stock by issuing new shares and repricing employee options. Energy woes and the dot-com bust have contributed to a decline in orders from California, a key market for this homebuilder. And the company can't keep repurchasing its stock as it did throughout 1999 and 2000.

CIENA
CIEN
LINTHICUM, MARYLAND NASDAQ

NVIDIA
NVDA
SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA NASDAQ


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$7 $20
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT
$25 $90
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The telecom bust is catching up with this optical networker. Many customers are in financial trouble. Others have too much leverage over pricing. Ciena's business generates erratic free cash flow, and insiders have been selling stock. This company's shares are riding high on hype over an exclusive agreement to supply graphics chips for Microsoft's new Xbox video game console. But Nvidia's success is more closely related to PC sales, which are weak.

GENTEX
GNTX
ZEELAND, MICHIGAN NASDAQ

TMP WORLDWIDE
TMPW
NEW YORK CITY NASDAQ


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

$8 $31
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT
$20 $48
FAIR VALUE SELLING AT


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

worth.com


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trading at 34 times its 2001 estimated earnings, this maker of self-dimming rearview mirrors won't live up to expectations. Falling car sales are hurting its business, and the company is losing market share to competitor Donnelly. The operator of employment site Monster.com will suffer as job ads dry up and employers demand better terms. TMP has hidden its low intrinsic growth rate by making 116 acquisitions since 1998. Its traditional businesses are down.



To: j g cordes who wrote (34558)10/1/2001 10:09:01 PM
From: Johnny Canuck  Respond to of 68166
 
The DSL Blues
by Robert X. Cringely October 2001, Worth Magazine
The technology exists to give millions of us better, faster Internet access. Guess who'd rather make us wait.
I'm a bandwidth junkie. And the truth is, we all are. Everyone I know would like a faster Internet connection. That's the attraction of a digital subscriber line, which is the fastest connection at a good price that most of us can get. Yet DSL is a source of frustration to many people because it can be so hard to get and then so hard to keep running. Almost every DSL user I know has a horror story of delayed installations and extended outages. And both of these problems can be traced back to a source that isn't an Internet service provider and probably isn't a DSL provider either. The problem is the phone company.

.
.
.

The ILECs actually want to delay DSL deployment. They don't want the technology to succeed too quickly, because that would mean massive, expensive upgrades to field gear. The only reason any ILEC built out a DSL product line was competitive pressure from CLECs and that darned Telecommunications Act of 1996, which they wanted so much at the time but now hate.

With long-distance dead as a profit center, the CLECs have swooned and the ILECs are back at square one—trying to boost profits by not spending money. Why upgrade when you can charge the same amount for the use of a 100-year-old plant?

To keep things this way, the ILECs are, for the most part, treating their DSL service as a loss leader. They have priced it to compete with CLEC offerings, even though that means they can't possibly make any money at it. This is why they are delaying customer installations. Why not hold that money-losing installation a few more months until all the DSL CLECs are dead, then raise prices? The ILECs have obviously learned something from Microsoft.

.
.
.

worth.com