SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lucretius who wrote (126724)10/1/2001 8:31:47 PM
From: robnhood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
That's for sure. Whenever I mention gold to anyone , I always get this strange look. (It's like ,, Cuckooooo) I'm sure you've seen it yourself. <vbg>



To: Lucretius who wrote (126724)10/1/2001 9:08:56 PM
From: sammaster  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
no comments on cpq warning by anyone on thread?
oh well, guess cpq always comes up with a reason for missing its numbers every quarter anyway....
this time everyone is using the same one...and they are saying that next quarter is affected also...
but their excuse for missing this quarter was not enough components(i always thought cpq had higher inventory than dell) and next quarter there will be no shortage of parts so they obviously are missing this quarter for other reasons also



To: Lucretius who wrote (126724)10/1/2001 9:50:32 PM
From: oldirtybastard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
shit dude you're the SI guru now, even the loonie morons can tell you nailed this move down big, can you handle the responsibility? -g- everyone is going to piggyback your trades now, front run it all the way -vbg-



To: Lucretius who wrote (126724)10/1/2001 10:45:19 PM
From: Real Man  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
EXDS and @home are bankrupt. Should Nasdaq-100 be renamed to Nasdaq-98? -g-