Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paul_philp who wrote (47377)	10/2/2001 10:01:57 AM
From: Mike Buckley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

Paul, If bias is a reason to question my credibility, I would advise you that my strong bias toward Moore, not against him, should be your yellow flag. Considering that you apparently have so little regard for my ability to maintain objectivity, I don't understand why you wanted me to answer your questions. Perhaps they were rhetorical. --Mike Buckley

To: paul_philp who wrote (47377)	10/2/2001 11:20:12 AM
From: areokat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 54805

>you have a strong bias against the author.< Paul. Mike doesn't, believe me. I've made a critical comment or two about Moore and Mike didn't buy either one. Some of us are of the opinion that Moore is a better writer than he is an investment theorist which would explain some of his statements that don't seem to fit GG theory? There were two other authors involved in the production of the Gorilla Game. I think what is happening now is that the small number of dyed-in-the-wool GGs are the ones that respond to posts these days so small differences are magnified. Mike and I both thought a year or so ago that the bear market would chase a lot of fair weather GGer out of the game. Moore just said the same, I think. And thank you for your stuff on BEAS. I've read until my head hurts. Kat