SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: goldsheet who wrote (77804)10/2/2001 6:36:55 AM
From: long-gone  Respond to of 116758
 
So the value of the remaining two in the Smithsonian....Do they really need two?

btw did you ever get any reply on changes in XAU? I didn't.



To: goldsheet who wrote (77804)10/2/2001 7:00:11 AM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116758
 
1933 $20 Saint-Gaudens Double Eagle Circulation strikes: 445,500

ok Bob, where are the other 445,500 - 3 = 445,497 other ones ?

something smells fishie here
they exist inside the usa government, these 445,497 ones
but not
or until the law is changed
and if so
then current value of the only one in private hands
willllllllllllll ????

Notes:

No coins of this date were ever allowed into circulation,
at least not officially. A handful of 1933 Double Eagles
exists today, but the Mint asserts that ownership is illegal
because they were removed without authorization from the
Mint. Thus, in the few instances when these have appeared
on the open market, they have been subject to seizure by the
U.S. government. The only "legitimate" examples are owned
or held by the government, one of which is illustrated above.
However, in 2001, the U.S. government reached an agreement
with the owners of the "Farouk-Fenton" specimen of the 1933
Double Eagle which allowed the coin to be sold, thus making
it the only example outside of government hands that is legal
to own.



To: goldsheet who wrote (77804)10/2/2001 9:33:34 AM
From: IngotWeTrust  Respond to of 116758
 
Chances=good it'll only be dusty. Cool contribution of the day award 2U, Bob!



To: goldsheet who wrote (77804)10/2/2001 9:35:11 AM
From: IngotWeTrust  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116758
 
Chances=good it'll only be dusty. Cool contribution of the day award 2U, Bob! Any indication as to why the Secret Service vault was being used? Authentication mayhaps?

Would have thought it would be in Bower's (or similar ilk) vault prior to sale...



To: goldsheet who wrote (77804)10/2/2001 9:53:21 AM
From: c.hinton  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 116758
 
The coin had been confiscated by the Treasury Dept.That may be why it was in the Secret Service vault.