To: FaultLine who wrote (2401 ) 10/3/2001 1:22:23 PM From: SirRealist Respond to of 281500 Hawk & F/L: Such knowledge makes them accessories to the fact... We might not be able to justify elimating them as combatants since they may not have been engaged in the planning and execution of this attack, but I'd say we are justified to seize their assets in the US (elsewhere if possible) and blare their names around the world as those who sought to profit by this act. Asset seizure is not enough. It reminds me of Teddy Roosevelt's comments about "...with education, you can steal the whole railroad." The wealthy financiers may not know the details, but they know they finance murderers and that should bring more than a financial setback.... like imprisonment in something less than a country club prison. BTW Hawk, I understand well that legal ways exist to rise from poverty. Since I've drawn the parallel between Afghanistan and the ghetto, places proven to exhibit lawless responses, perhaps there is something else common to both.... missing daddies. Just a thought. F/L wrote: I've been trying to put together a mental model that rationalizes our WWII actions within the context of the present situation. That total war scenario Hawk described is not confined to WW2.... we pretty much faced the same thing in South Vietnam. Not that they were attacking us here, but by all reports, many in the South worked against us and viewed Ho Chi Minh, not the US, as the liberator. As I said, these are the ugly realities of war. Civilians die and innocents die (even under 'total war' there's no argument that young children are not innocents). I do not seek rationalizations nor easy answers. In some cases, war is the only answer that has demonstrated effectiveness. And in some cases, what is defined in black and white terms as 'terrorism', reasons exist and the actions prove effective. All righteous coups are not bloodless.