Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (132452)	10/3/2001 2:58:12 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>>Skeeter the response has to be on scale with the attacks.<< victor, nice ad hominem. absurd, but that is a minor detail. >>Of course we must try to avoid hurting innocent people.<< uh, victor, that was my point you contested by saying the ALL were GUILTY. at least you see the light. >>These people seem to understand only savagery in response to their savagery. It did the trick with M. Quadaffy, even though many insisted it wouldn't.<< dangerous folks need to be dealt with. we should avoid as much collateral damage as is deemed reasonable without devaluing humanity to justify some irresponsible killing. i thought it was unreasonable for you to attack this point and, after a really weird and convoluted process, you now agree without being agreeable ;-) >>Did you know that Bush was scheduled to deliver an address to the UN about a week after the attacks supporting a new independent Palestinain state?<< radicals of this nature don't want peace. they want war. they want a pissed off palestine and a justification to kill innocent people. i think we are different. i would do something different, though, if i were in bush's shoes. i would provide the taliban (even though they are a bad, bad joke) with the evidence. then, after they balk, i'd proceed with military action. but, i'd give them the chance.

To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (132452)	10/3/2001 2:58:23 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

>>Skeeter the response has to be on scale with the attacks.<< victor, nice ad hominem. absurd, but that is a minor detail, right? >>Of course we must try to avoid hurting innocent people.<< uh, victor, that was my point you contested by saying the ALL were GUILTY. at least you see the light. >>These people seem to understand only savagery in response to their savagery. It did the trick with M. Quadaffy, even though many insisted it wouldn't.<< dangerous folks need to be dealt with. we should avoid as much collateral damage as is deemed reasonable without devaluing humanity to justify some irresponsible killing. i thought it was unreasonable for you to attack this point and, after a really weird and convoluted process, you now agree without being agreeable ;-) >>Did you know that Bush was scheduled to deliver an address to the UN about a week after the attacks supporting a new independent Palestinain state?<< radicals of this nature don't want peace. they want war. they want a pissed off palestine and a justification to kill innocent people. i think we are different. i would do something different, though, if i were in bush's shoes. i would provide the taliban (even though they are a bad, bad joke) with the evidence. then, after they balk, i'd proceed with military action. but, i'd give them the chance.