Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (53676)	10/3/2001 1:38:32 PM
From: FiloF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

You are right. I, for one, apologize to the thread, since all of mine have been off topic. [I felt a need to counter some of the bias out there -- I still have more to say but I will keep my trap shut on this thread.] Good luck on the investing front.

To: Math Junkie who wrote (53676)	10/3/2001 1:49:23 PM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Here is some AMAT TA which I hope makes up for some of it. Doing a regression analysis on the weekly charts as far back as '94, you can see that AMAT is about 3 standard diviations below the regression line. This is the bottom range of the historical trend. So a bottom may have been seen. If history holds, in about 9 months AMAT should hit $75 and in a bit over a year it should peak at over 100. History may not repeat itself though. AMAT has been tracking SOX pretty well. I am guessing that at some point in the future SOX will outperform AMAT. But that remains to be seen. Should SOX outperform for more than a month, historical measures of AMAT may not hold. Sun Tzu

To: Math Junkie who wrote (53676)	10/3/2001 1:51:41 PM
From: Gottfried	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Richard, OT *** OT posts: a solution Posters could post ON topic and then add anything OFF topic below as a PS. G.