SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (144642)10/3/2001 3:13:29 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Pete, Re: "Intel flat out stated it has a restricted front and back end"

Bullcrap. Where's the proof? Show me where in the white-paper that Intel says this.

wanna_bmw

P.S. You and the people of Afghanistan have something in common. You are so set in your beliefs that no amount of concrete evidence will convince you otherwise. But how about going for a change of pace, and backing up your wild beliefs for a change?



To: pgerassi who wrote (144642)10/3/2001 3:14:54 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Pete, <I was not the only one that claimed that the pipeline has a restricted back end, Intel flat out stated it has a restricted front and back end.>

AMD claims that Athlon can execute nine instructions at a time. Yet its back end can only retire three instructions at a time. Would you call that "restricted" as well?

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News