SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (139553)10/3/2001 5:23:01 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580694
 
A related link

NO MORE TASK FORCE SMITHS
By Col. Harry G. Summers Jr.

legion.org

Do you know what task force Smith was Ted? We are not there yet but we might be if we continue to cut military spending.

Tim



To: TimF who wrote (139553)10/3/2001 9:25:44 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580694
 
GDP can grow and not necessarily result in a larger budget...

And you point is? GDP can grow and not result in a larger budget. A tree can grow and not result in a larger budget as well. I really don't understand where you are comming from on this one.


You use the measurement of 3% of the GDP as if that's a significant measurement and further, as evidence that our defense spending is a reasonable number...3%. But to me that is not the significant measurement. GDP impacts the federal budget but there is not a direct correlation. Congress determines how much it will spend, not the GDP. The GDP may be 1 trillion one year, and 2 the next but that does not mean military spending will be 3% of 1 trillion and then 3% of 2 the next. The budget for both years may be the same number no matter how much the GDP changes, and that may be true for military spending as well. The number that is most realistic and most defines how much we spend on the military [besides the actual dollar figure] is the number that reflects a percentage of the total budget.

Also even by your prefered method defense spending has come down a lot and will continue to go down. It will almost certinly be a lower percentage of the federal budget in ten years even with SDI and new homeland defense spending.

It doesn't look like its going to continue to come down...spending is going over the top. See my post to Harry.

BTW - What areas of US military involvement in the world would you cancel in order to have less need for a large military and how much do you think that would save? Should we not deploy to the area around Afghanistan? Should we get out of Kuwait or the Balkans? Should we rescind our promises to help protect our NATO allies and Japan and South Korea. Should we tell Taiwan they are on their own should the communists ever attack?

I never said to cut back; I just don't want to increase for SDI. Right now, every one has there hand out. On top of that, some Congressional reps are pulling out the pork and trying to slip that into the latest funding proposals. I guess its very American and therefore, acceptable. Such bull!

If spending was still at it's cold war peak then I would agree with you that it should be cut. But when we have half of the active airforce wings and not much more then half of the army divisions and naval combat ships then it has allready been slashed.

Once again, I did not say to slash it..I just don't want to spend more. Washington is handing out money like its going out of style. I can handle all the good boy politics but I will not stand by while our $$$ is passed around for pork, or for ineffectual or pie-in-the-sky defense systems. Every year the military screams we need all this money for defense to keep this country safe. After trillions of dollars spent, we lost the WTC without a fight; not because we didn't have billions of dollars worth of planes and missiles but because our military never thought terrorists would attack internally. Hollywood new..to wit all the terrorists movies over the last 15 years...but our military didn't. Go figure!

I love this country and am very proud of the principles to which it aspires, but what went on 9/11 makes me very sad.

ted