Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lucretius who wrote (20786)	10/4/2001 1:52:35 PM
From: dennis michael patterson	Respond to of 52237

>>hays has been bullish since the april low nonstop<< my recollection is the same. Adam Trask has been discussing this on TheSTreet.com. Hays has been bullish for many points.

To: Lucretius who wrote (20786)	10/4/2001 3:09:50 PM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 52237

Luc: I find it ludicrous when you point your finger at anyone, but that is just about all you've done since you began posting on SI. You called for a crash almost every single week (more like daily) from early 97 forward. That was about FOUR THOUSANDS POINTS before the NASDAQ Composite topped out! Yeah, you’re one hell of a market timer...ROTFLMAO. The Naz Comp will have to fall to 1000, just for you to break even...LOL Of course, no one but a mindless idiot would believe you actually traded all those bad calls you made for years and years. Calling for crash every other day and posting vague short sell calls or vague put buys which rarely if ever were done in real time and only on rare occasion did you actually provide the name of the issues you were trading. Even more rare were your cover posts, which if done on a regular basis would have pointed an even brighter spotlight on all those bad calls you made for years and thousands of points...LOL LG