Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lola who wrote (6228)	10/4/2001 4:45:59 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27710

<< So if you can't beat the terrorists you join them? Interesting battle plan. >> On the contrary. If the present military government of Pakistan is willing to work with us, against terrorism, what would you have the US do? Would you have us declare Pakistan an enemy, instead of a friend, for the problems that Pakistan has had over the last few decades? The fact that the military government of Pakistan is willing to work with us, and not against us, is great! As a reminder, they are a nuclear power, also.

To: Lola who wrote (6228)	10/4/2001 4:54:35 PM
From: Machaon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27710

<< How can you say you are against terrorism when you side with the terrorists? >> On the contrary, if governments, who have supported terrorism in the past, are willing to be our allies AGAINST terrorism, we only have one choice. Work with these countries, in step 1, against even their battles with terrorism. You have to crawl before you can walk. The governments in such terrorist countries, such as Afghanistan, who is deeply entrenched in terrorism, must be removed from power and nullified. There are more problems ahead. It isn't going to be easy. Sound bites are meaningless. There are still significant terrorists in other places, like the PLO, Kasmir, North Korea, etc., that still have to be reckoned with.