SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donald sew who wrote (20827)10/4/2001 4:52:23 PM
From: Paul Shread  Respond to of 52237
 
At 15 times sales, they're only three times more expensive than Cisco. A bargain, I would think. <g>



To: donald sew who wrote (20827)10/4/2001 5:07:36 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52237
 
LOL! Sounds expensive in ANY mkt,,eom



To: donald sew who wrote (20827)10/4/2001 5:11:58 PM
From: DukeCrow  Respond to of 52237
 
Looking at it from a cash perspective, QCOM had $455.7 million in free cash flow for the 12 months ending July 1. That gives the company a market cap to FCF ratio of 70.

Still expensive.



To: donald sew who wrote (20827)10/4/2001 5:44:15 PM
From: Louis V. Lambrecht  Respond to of 52237
 
don - especially if the EPS is NEGATIVE
marketguide.com
QCOM lost $0.66 so far, total for the 3 first quarters.

Oh! Yeah! I forgot the "new economy" paradigm, EBITDA without losses and charges. On a "pro forma" basis, EPS can be anything you want me to say. <g>



To: donald sew who wrote (20827)10/4/2001 5:52:14 PM
From: Nancy  Respond to of 52237
 
don,

do we have a gravestone doji on naz today ?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News