SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (127497)10/4/2001 5:45:54 PM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
Heinz are you expecting another low in a week or two ?? As the situation stands now it will not be around an earning type of event. :(.

My take / hope is that we will trade sideways with some bias up



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (127497)10/4/2001 5:50:20 PM
From: Nathan  Respond to of 436258
 
Thanks again Heinz eom



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (127497)10/4/2001 7:45:34 PM
From: steve susko  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
do you have a link for that PRinceton Institute?



To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (127497)10/5/2001 1:26:35 PM
From: SunSunM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Hi hb,

I was almost drooling when I read Martin Armstrong's prediction of gold dated May 14, 1997.

>>
...
Its minimum target is $1,000-1,200/oz., which would simply bring it in line with other assets. The uncertainty factor could well cause it to soar to $4000-5000/oz. In case the market perceives a danger to the present currency system, a potential target for gold would be $10,000/oz.
...
<<

KC.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News