Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Americans 4 "No Own - No Sell" -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GraceZ who wrote (370)	10/5/2001 11:20:13 AM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 455

I understand the premise and agree. But that is where the naked shorts want to go so I go there. Legal shorting is fine with me. Legal hedging is fine, legal puts and calls also. Plus I understand the concept and the stall out effect of not have a way to counter the longs. But what I can't figure out is why the naked shorts get away with what they do which is why I started the petition. I do not like the way margins work and I will never open up a margin account. P2bAAAT & DSAS

To: GraceZ who wrote (370)	10/5/2001 11:34:49 AM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 455

However, I do have a problem with borrow someone else's property and they are not the lender and I have aproblem with transparency with checks and balances. The first simply proves there is a sucker born every minute which is why I will not have a margin account and buy on margin. Transparency is good because for once in America;s history could numbers and figures be stated and thus make any research report valid because the historical data would be complete at least for legal scenarios. And that includes hedging. P2bAAAT & DSAS