To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (31088 ) 10/7/2001 4:32:14 PM From: E Respond to of 82486 I remind you that it was not I, but J. Edgar Hoover and the Attorney General of the United States who described the internments as unnecessary and simply a response to local political pressures. And it was Curtis Munson, a specially appointed presidential investigator, who found in a ten year study "an extraordinary degree of loyalty," among Americans of Japanese descent-- a study which btw only "corroborated years of surveillance by PBI and Naval Intelligence." As for motives, Hawaii proves they weren't based on military necessity, as does the absence of convictions -- oh, wait, not of convictions, of charges, even! -- of the arrested citizens for the dastardly acts you suspect. Additional evidence that there was another force at work than 'military necessity' is the conditions of privation, malnutrition, non-notification of families of where their beloved ones had been taken, and perfect willingness to break up these families and impoverish them. Here are more data suggestive of what caused the vileness, and it was not the behavior of the Japanese Americans: LA Times quote: "[a] viper is nonetheless a viper wherever the egg is hatched..." Gen. DeWitt before Congress: "[y]ou needn't worry about the Italians [Italian Americans]... ...the same for the Germans [German Americans]... But we must worry about the Japanese [Japanese American] all the time until he is wiped off the map. " I remind you again that none of the 'dastardly' acts you propose those Americans who were arrested might have committed had they not been incarcerated occurred in Hawaii, where Japanese Americans remained free. (That was your oddest defense, and suggests that mere innocence should not deter us from imprisoning citizens at will on the grounds that if free, some of the arrested might conceivably take it into their heads to commit crimes.) In my previous post I provided some of the "Yellow Peril"- mentality background that had been going on for decades, and that flowered at last into the camps as the flames were fanned by opportunist politicians and the media. It addresses your naive question about motivation. "Purely" racist? No. Not purely. Racism is never "pure," it always benefits some constituencies. I've provided some of this background in the previous post. Item: The American Legion, since its founding in 1919, had never once failed to pass an annual resolution against the Japanese Americans. The Associated Farmers in California had competitive reasons for wanting to get rid of the Japanese Americans. Item: The 100thd and &442d of Japanese American soldiers, the most-decorated, the bravest of the brave, the most loyal of the loyal, were sent to rescue a Texas "lost battalion," and did so, after five days of battle, suffering 800 casualties, including 184 killed in action, to rescue 211 Texans. Thank you, dead American heroes, thank you also to the American children and grandchildren of Japanese descent who were never born because, to save caucasians, you died too young to experience the joys of fatherhood. Thank you, thank you, I am sorry, and ashamed, for your families' losses, and for what they were forced to endure while you fought and died. Please forgive those of us who feel remorse, as well as those of us who don't.