To: Monica Detwiler who wrote (57455 ) 10/6/2001 8:29:54 PM From: combjelly Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872 "No OEMs have announced plans to use it - no ISVs have announced software product plans for it." No big surprise there, considering the companies that got burned because they committed to the Itanium and then it got stuck in a holding pattern for several years. I would guess that they would wait until it is close to shipping before publicly committing to it. Considering that a simple re-compile will move most applications to x86-64, there doesn't have to be a big upfront commitment from the software iSV's also. So, unlike Itanium, AMD does not have to bribe companies to make public announcements that they may or may not follow through on, they can let the software companies decide when it makes sense from a business point of view to port their products. It is hard to over-state exactly how brilliant AMD's approach to 64 bit computing is. The best analogy is the 80386. Companies bought 386 machines as a machine that they could run their 16 bit software on, and then have the option to transition to 32 bit software later. With the Hammers, a similar thing could be done to transition from 32 bits to 64 bits. Even if, like the 386, software to support the newer mode is not available at time of shipping, it isn't a big deal. Part of the reason for the difference between Intel's and AMD's implementation is that they are approaching the market two different ways. Intel is trying for a pure 64 bit approach and competing with Sun and IBM. AMD is going for the desktop and trying to offer a product that will transition 32 bit products to 64 bit ones. Frankly, this is a brighter way to do it because it offers backwards compatibility, something that is extremely important. The Itanium requires abandoning current 32 bit software to make the transition, while the Hammers allow that software to be conserved. Now this is ok as long as the software that is being run on those 64 bit systems is going to replaced anyway, and that is the case for some of the market. But AMD is targeting those who want to keep their options open, and there is a much larger market for that. Sorry Monica, you picked the wrong door, again. Bye, bye. You are the weakest link...